|
The organisers of the masterclass on toxicogenomics and bioinformatics
interpreted the definition of a masterclass quite literally. The
participants were taught by two ‘masters’, Rob Stierum, toxicologist at
TNO Zeist, and Perry Moerland, bioinformaticist at AMC Amsterdam, and
even had to prepare and present their homework.
Endpoint
The week before GRE2007 the participants received two scientific papers
and some questions to think about. The masterclass started with a few
presentations in which participants presented their resulting ideas.
According to them, toxicogenomics is more than a way of reducing the
number of animal tests, as it supplies scientists with additional
information. It gives not only an endpoint, but also the pathway by
which this can be reached.
Gene sets
Rob Stierum stated that in recent years, toxicology has become more and
more molecular in nature, while regulatory toxicology stayed behind. It
is time for a change, according to Stierum. Perry Moerland explained
that there are four directions in which research in this field is
developing. The most important development is that genetic analysis is
performed increasingly on gene sets instead of single genes. Such a gene
set can be a group of genes that all function within the same pathway or
are located on the same chromosome. Gene set analysis has the advantage
of being more sensitive, more robust and less hampered by noise.
Combine
data
Moerland
showed an example of diabetes, where the effect of single genes was
quite small, but the combination clearly showed a trend. Furthermore,
this type of analysis makes it easier to combine data from different
labs, which is the second development that Moerland mentioned. Other
developments are the combination of data from different organism and
from different techniques.
Different organisms
In the final discussion, the value of toxicogenomics was questioned,
considering that the sensitivity appears to be similar to or even worse
than traditional methods. One of the participants mentioned the example
of ecotoxicology. In this field, the traditional methods were limited to
a few different organisms, whereas toxicogenomics enables tests for
numerous different organisms. Moerland presented another example. Using
toxicogenomics, the duration of traditional tests on carcinogenesis,
which normally take two years, can be reduced.
[Els van den Brink]
|
|